The Consummate Entertainer
March 4th, 2010I was talking to the ladyfriend about the unfortunate passing of Andrew Koenig, for it really bummed me out. No, I never watched Growing Pains, but he was the producer of a podcast I listen to semi-regularly. Titled Never Not Funny, the show is comedian Jimmy Pardo’s forum to crack wise with friends and celebrity guests. I tried to explain to her how much I enjoy the podcast and how much I admire Pardo (and sympathize with him for the loss of his brother-in-law and producer), but I had some trouble putting it into words.
The thing is, Jimmy Pardo is a good comic, but not a great one. His act is fine, but what sets him apart from others is his manner. He has an energetic style that tells audiences that he’s the entertainer. Thus, he is at his best when riffing with the crowd or other comedians. I can’t think of many people who are more comfortable with an audience in front of him. Watch any episode of his version of “You Bet Your Life” to see him in action. His jokes don’t always work, but their purpose is always clear — keep the audience entertained and on Team Jimmy. It struck me that this is a talent that very few people have in show-business. Surprisingly enough, I would put Jimmy Pardo on a very short list of people I’ll refer to as consummate entertainers.
It’s a tough balance to be a truly consummate entertainer. You have to have a light attitude, but not too light. You should be consistently amusing, but able to defer to those who share your stage. Most importantly, every decision you make should be in the interest of the audience. Based on these strict criteria, the only consummate entertainers (among living non-musicians) I can think of are as follows: Jimmy Pardo, Regis Philbin, and Conan O’Brien.
That’s a surprising list to come from me, especially for its omissions. For example, why not include David Letterman, a comedy hero of mine? Well, he’s cranky and intentionally inaccessible to many. He likes having a slightly offbeat, selective audience so he can rant about his personal life and not worry about entertaining every single person. His attitude is one of, “if you like me, great; if not, screw off.” That can make for a very funny person, but not a consummate entertainer.
In a similar vein, why not Jay Leno? He’s always brought big ratings, and he always tries to appeal to the largest audience. The problem isn’t just that he isn’t funny anymore and tells the same four predictable jokes over and over. The real problem is his interviewing skills. His mission in interviews isn’t to entertain the audience, but to allow the guest to recite his prepared bits and stories. Sure, talk-show hosts have to do that to some degree, but that’s all Leno does. (And it’s so awkward: “I understand you built a shark tank in your house…”) Also, Jay Leno doesn’t make the list because I want to distinguish “consummate entertainer” from “middlebrow sense of humor”.
Missing the list also is Ryan Seacrest. He’s a capable host, but that’s it. He doesn’t sing, dance, tell jokes, have interesting opinions, or do much of anything. He gets a mention, though, because he hosts our nation’s most popular show, which should be worth something.
I thought about putting Oprah Winfrey on the list, but quickly declined because I don’t remember being particularly entertained by her at any time. I admit that I don’t watch her show, so I might be missing a lot. She isn’t known for any talent besides incredible business acumen, so I doubt it. But if someone would like to write an impassioned defense of Oprah as a great entertainer, I’d like to read it.
Come to think of it, I could probably cite ignorance regarding most women who might have made the list. I like Bonnie Hunt on Letterman, but I’ve never seen her show. Joan Rivers was funny in her day, but I was too young to have seen her host The Tonight Show. I think I know enough about Ellen DeGeneres to leave her off — the American Idol watchers I know haven’t been blown away by her performance this year. Sarah Silverman I love, but she’s too niche (the same can be said of Amy Sedaris, Maria Bamford, or a host of other comediennes). Call it the innate sexism of showbiz, but most women are either too underexposed or simply unworthy of this arbitrary title I just made up.
Almost making the list as a surprise entrant was Howard Stern. Full disclosure: I’m not a fan. His humor is mostly lowbrow, his interview style is exploitative, and his fans aren’t usually people I associate with. That said, he’s very close to being a consummate entertainer. Everything he does on his show is designed to keep listeners’ attention. Remember in Private Parts (a good watch if you haven’t seen it) when the radio producer says that the people who said they hated Howard Stern listened to him over twice as long as those who liked him? If that’s the case, he’s doing something brilliant. Even on others’ talk shows, he brings something to the table beyond lame-ass stories. I had to leave him off the list, however, because he turns off too many people. Too much of his brilliance comes out of making vast swaths of people uncomfortable, and no consummate entertainer would sacrifice that much of his audience. Plus, he very rarely performs onstage, which, the more I think about it, should be a requirement. Sorry, Howard.
The “stage performers only” requirement eliminates many others who might be more than capable of becoming consummate entertainers. Steve Martin used to be, but not since he retired from stand-up. Alec Baldwin is close, but he’s only onstage the days he hosts SNL. The same problem keeps Christopher Walken off the list. I’m super-tempted to put Justin Timberlake on the list, but I told myself I’d eliminate musicians, and most of his stage time is musical.
So let’s get to who’s on the list. These are three very different entertainers, but I think they’ve all earned their spot. Pardo I’ve covered. Regis should be easy: he’s proven himself every day for almost fifty years. No matter his role (talk-show host, talk-show guest, gameshow host, comedic actor), he’s always a delight. He’s a ridiculous man, but his attitude is perfect for the occasion. No one in history has logged more hours on television, which is fitting because he seems to be the only person who truly belongs there.
Why Conan? It’s not just because I love him. Watch his show… er, watch clips of his old Late Night show. Even when he tells bad jokes, he twists them into an entertaining moment. He does his fair share of mugging in these moments, but he knows when to stop (something that keeps Robin Williams off the list forever). In interviews, he often does the Leno-esque setups for guests, but he plays with it a lot. He’ll make fun of the fact that a celebrity has a prepared story, or (if he’s feeling more Lettermanish) he’ll try to interrupt and screw up what was likely to be a snoozer. Plus, his humor is apolitical and mostly silly, which makes it easy to keep most people on board. I think that makes my point about Conan — I’ve written enough about him already, anyway.
So… whom am I missing? I’ve racked my brain for the last few hours, but I’m sure somebody slipped through the cracks of this steel trap of mine. (Ah, how I love the nonsensical mixed metaphor.) What do you think — good list? Should I add Don Rickles… or Bill Cosby? The answer to both is “probably not”, but help me flesh this out.
-Darrell